Public Steam disclosure research25,497 disclosures tracked
Where do games disclose AI use?
Search developers’ Steam disclosures, compare classified AI use across
games, and follow recorded changes.
This index adds cross-game classifications and statistics to
statements published on individual store pages.
Groups reflect automatic analysis of public disclosures; mature records are excluded. These counts do not measure AI use across all of Steam.
Missing or unclear statements cannot establish whether a game uses AI.
This game uses AI to generate design drafts and sketches for some characters and scenes. All final in-game assets have been manually adjusted, revised, and finalized by the development team. Additionally, some in-game music and voice lines are AI-synthesized, all of which have undergone full manual editing and post-processing by our audio team.
AI is used to generate some art and sound during parts of development. As a solo dev this is a way for me to test gameplay easy.
Translations for store pages are also made with AI
AI was used to assist with programming and refining in-game text (item descriptions, skill descriptions, UI text). Key art and logo are human-created. All other visual and audio assets are default RPG Maker MZ assets provided under license.
AI Disclosure:
Generative AI tools were used during development to assist in creating some visual assets and refining animations. Additionally, AI-assisted tools were utilized for technical optimization to ensure a stable gameplay experience. All results were manually reviewed and finalized by the developer. This game does not use any live-generated AI content.
Football Conquerors uses generative AI tools during development for some pre-generated assets and iteration workflows, including concept visuals, selected card/store artwork drafts, music drafts, and writing/code assistance.
All AI-assisted outputs are reviewed, edited, and approved by the developer before release.
The released game does not generate player-facing content or code in real time during gameplay, and it does not require a live third-party generative AI service during play.
During the early prototyping phase, I use AI tools to visualize initial concepts and create temporary placeholders. All of these have been completely replaced in the final game with hand-crafted art created by myself and talented freelancers.
AI is used to generate in-game characters, including their visual traits, background concepts, and gameplay attributes. When players create a character, the Gen-AI system produces unique variations based on predefined rules and developer-designed parameters.
The AI functions solely as a content generation tool to enhance gameplay variety. It does not collect, store, or learn from personal player data.
Some of the pre-made visual elements used in Quadrix—including certain card images/templates, game music, and some game mode icons—were created with the help of generative AI tools. These elements were reviewed, selected, and refined by the developer before being added to the game to ensure they align with the game’s visual style and usability requirements. Quadrix does not use real-time generative AI during gameplay, and players cannot generate AI-generated content within the game.
I'm a solo dev and the game is still in an early state of development. It contains AI generated assets that are being used as placeholders until I can replace them properly. This includes plugin illustrations, some module sprites, and a few sound effects.
None of the current assets, including the ones I made with Paint, will be kept in the final game.
After I personally finalized the design phase, some art assets were first rendered using generative AI tools, and I then manually refined and detailed them.
Similarly, certain background music pieces were developed with the help of generative AI tools.
Should you have any concerns about these methods, please feel free to experience the game according to your own preferences. Thank you for your understanding and consideration.
This game includes content generated by generative AI.
Content created using generative AI:
BGM (in-game)
Advertisement images (in-game)
Translations (in-game)
Promotional video BGM (store page)
Advertisement images behind the logo (store page)
Translations of the game description (store page)
This game uses generative AI in a limited capacity. Some in-game images and text were created or assisted by AI during development, but they are not entirely AI-generated. All such content has been manually edited, reviewed, and integrated by the developer to ensure consistency with the overall design and experience.
Some visual assets in this game are created with the assistance of generative AI during development. This includes portions of the card artwork, some environmental/scenery visuals, and some character illustrations. These AI-assisted assets are curated, edited, and integrated by the developer as part of the game’s art pipeline. No live-generated AI content is used during gameplay.
Generative AI was not used for in-game art, gameplay assets, systems, or core game content.
AI translation tools were used only for some additional text added later during development. Most localization was handled by a professional translation vendor.
The only AI-generated visual assets currently used are the Steam header capsule and library logo illustrations, which were manually retouched. They are not used inside the actual game, and I plan to replace them after release if the game earns enough revenue.
I feel the AI tag for my game is not actually reasonable. i tried to explain myself to steam and to stop forcing me to set this AI toggle but the automated system is forcing me to say i used AI
This game uses generative AI in several components. As a solo/small developer, the project wouldn't be feasible without it, but my goal is to fund human-created replacements through the game's revenue after early acces release.
Artwork-
AI generates the base/reference character sprites, which I then paint over and animate by hand.
Item and tileset sprites follow the same treatment, some items may remain unedited in early access to be reviewed later.
Music - AI generated music with rights held by Bonehead Labs.
Capsule art - combination of AI generation and hand-work.
Generative AI tools were used during development for concept exploration, prototyping, and internal reference materials. All gameplay systems, visuals, text, and audio included in the released game are authored, curated, and reviewed by the developer.
Our game includes the use of AI-assisted visual content.
Certain CG (cutscene) images in the game were generated with the assistance of AI tools, based on keyframes and visual direction created by our art team. These assets are pre-generated during development and are not created dynamically.
All AI-assisted content is limited to visual presentation only. It is optional, and does not affect gameplay systems, player interaction, progression, or game logic.
All core gameplay design, narrative structure, and interactive content are fully created and implemented by the development team.
AI was used as a productivity tool to assist in coding and drafting assets. All final content, including art and logic, has been extensively refined and reconstructed by human developers to ensure quality.
During the development process, we may use AI-based tools to assist with content creation. In all such cases, the final product reflects the creativity and expression of our own development team.
During development, artificial intelligence tools were used to assist in the creation of certain game assets, including some images (such as store page visuals and in-game textures), localization, and audio content.
All AI-generated or AI-assisted content was reviewed, modified where necessary, and approved by the developers to ensure quality and consistency.
The card artwork in the current version of the game was created using generative AI tools and then manually edited and refined by the developer. AI was not used for gameplay code or core story content. These artworks are intended as temporary assets and are planned to be replaced with commissioned artwork in the future.
Most of the content is developed using traditional development practices.
However, AI tools were used to support the creation of certain 3D in-game assets and audio assets.
I'm a solo developer so I have used AI to help fill in some gaps. Music and very minor pieces of art were created using AI. However I have supported many artists during the making of this game by purchasing asset packs that worked. I've been in the game industry for over a decade and am extremely sensitive to the use of AI but this project wouldn't exist without it and I am very proud of what I have made. My heart, soul, and countless hours have been poured into the project and AI was only used if there was no other reasonable/affordable choice.
Initial concept art was generated using AI tools, followed by manual adjustments and modifications by artists. The final artwork combines AI-generated base designs with human-made artistic revisions.
AI tools were used strictly during the development phase to assist with writing code scripts and drafting text descriptions. All game mechanics, logic, and assets were manually reviewed, tested, and finalized by the developer.
This game uses AI to generate design drafts and sketches for some characters and scenes. All final in-game assets have been manually adjusted, revised, and finalized by the development team. Additionally, some in-game music and voice lines are AI-synthesized, all of which have undergone full manual editing and post-processing by our audio team.
AI is used to generate some art and sound during parts of development. As a solo dev this is a way for me to test gameplay easy.
Translations for store pages are also made with AI
AI was used to assist with programming and refining in-game text (item descriptions, skill descriptions, UI text). Key art and logo are human-created. All other visual and audio assets are default RPG Maker MZ assets provided under license.
AI Disclosure:
Generative AI tools were used during development to assist in creating some visual assets and refining animations. Additionally, AI-assisted tools were utilized for technical optimization to ensure a stable gameplay experience. All results were manually reviewed and finalized by the developer. This game does not use any live-generated AI content.
Football Conquerors uses generative AI tools during development for some pre-generated assets and iteration workflows, including concept visuals, selected card/store artwork drafts, music drafts, and writing/code assistance.
All AI-assisted outputs are reviewed, edited, and approved by the developer before release.
The released game does not generate player-facing content or code in real time during gameplay, and it does not require a live third-party generative AI service during play.
During the early prototyping phase, I use AI tools to visualize initial concepts and create temporary placeholders. All of these have been completely replaced in the final game with hand-crafted art created by myself and talented freelancers.
AI is used to generate in-game characters, including their visual traits, background concepts, and gameplay attributes. When players create a character, the Gen-AI system produces unique variations based on predefined rules and developer-designed parameters.
The AI functions solely as a content generation tool to enhance gameplay variety. It does not collect, store, or learn from personal player data.
Some of the pre-made visual elements used in Quadrix—including certain card images/templates, game music, and some game mode icons—were created with the help of generative AI tools. These elements were reviewed, selected, and refined by the developer before being added to the game to ensure they align with the game’s visual style and usability requirements. Quadrix does not use real-time generative AI during gameplay, and players cannot generate AI-generated content within the game.
I'm a solo dev and the game is still in an early state of development. It contains AI generated assets that are being used as placeholders until I can replace them properly. This includes plugin illustrations, some module sprites, and a few sound effects.
None of the current assets, including the ones I made with Paint, will be kept in the final game.
After I personally finalized the design phase, some art assets were first rendered using generative AI tools, and I then manually refined and detailed them.
Similarly, certain background music pieces were developed with the help of generative AI tools.
Should you have any concerns about these methods, please feel free to experience the game according to your own preferences. Thank you for your understanding and consideration.
This game includes content generated by generative AI.
Content created using generative AI:
BGM (in-game)
Advertisement images (in-game)
Translations (in-game)
Promotional video BGM (store page)
Advertisement images behind the logo (store page)
Translations of the game description (store page)
This game uses generative AI in a limited capacity. Some in-game images and text were created or assisted by AI during development, but they are not entirely AI-generated. All such content has been manually edited, reviewed, and integrated by the developer to ensure consistency with the overall design and experience.
Some visual assets in this game are created with the assistance of generative AI during development. This includes portions of the card artwork, some environmental/scenery visuals, and some character illustrations. These AI-assisted assets are curated, edited, and integrated by the developer as part of the game’s art pipeline. No live-generated AI content is used during gameplay.
Generative AI was not used for in-game art, gameplay assets, systems, or core game content.
AI translation tools were used only for some additional text added later during development. Most localization was handled by a professional translation vendor.
The only AI-generated visual assets currently used are the Steam header capsule and library logo illustrations, which were manually retouched. They are not used inside the actual game, and I plan to replace them after release if the game earns enough revenue.
I feel the AI tag for my game is not actually reasonable. i tried to explain myself to steam and to stop forcing me to set this AI toggle but the automated system is forcing me to say i used AI
This game uses generative AI in several components. As a solo/small developer, the project wouldn't be feasible without it, but my goal is to fund human-created replacements through the game's revenue after early acces release.
Artwork-
AI generates the base/reference character sprites, which I then paint over and animate by hand.
Item and tileset sprites follow the same treatment, some items may remain unedited in early access to be reviewed later.
Music - AI generated music with rights held by Bonehead Labs.
Capsule art - combination of AI generation and hand-work.
Generative AI tools were used during development for concept exploration, prototyping, and internal reference materials. All gameplay systems, visuals, text, and audio included in the released game are authored, curated, and reviewed by the developer.
Our game includes the use of AI-assisted visual content.
Certain CG (cutscene) images in the game were generated with the assistance of AI tools, based on keyframes and visual direction created by our art team. These assets are pre-generated during development and are not created dynamically.
All AI-assisted content is limited to visual presentation only. It is optional, and does not affect gameplay systems, player interaction, progression, or game logic.
All core gameplay design, narrative structure, and interactive content are fully created and implemented by the development team.
AI was used as a productivity tool to assist in coding and drafting assets. All final content, including art and logic, has been extensively refined and reconstructed by human developers to ensure quality.
During the development process, we may use AI-based tools to assist with content creation. In all such cases, the final product reflects the creativity and expression of our own development team.
During development, artificial intelligence tools were used to assist in the creation of certain game assets, including some images (such as store page visuals and in-game textures), localization, and audio content.
All AI-generated or AI-assisted content was reviewed, modified where necessary, and approved by the developers to ensure quality and consistency.
The card artwork in the current version of the game was created using generative AI tools and then manually edited and refined by the developer. AI was not used for gameplay code or core story content. These artworks are intended as temporary assets and are planned to be replaced with commissioned artwork in the future.
Most of the content is developed using traditional development practices.
However, AI tools were used to support the creation of certain 3D in-game assets and audio assets.
I'm a solo developer so I have used AI to help fill in some gaps. Music and very minor pieces of art were created using AI. However I have supported many artists during the making of this game by purchasing asset packs that worked. I've been in the game industry for over a decade and am extremely sensitive to the use of AI but this project wouldn't exist without it and I am very proud of what I have made. My heart, soul, and countless hours have been poured into the project and AI was only used if there was no other reasonable/affordable choice.
Initial concept art was generated using AI tools, followed by manual adjustments and modifications by artists. The final artwork combines AI-generated base designs with human-made artistic revisions.
AI tools were used strictly during the development phase to assist with writing code scripts and drafting text descriptions. All game mechanics, logic, and assets were manually reviewed, tested, and finalized by the developer.