Disclosure analysis
AI content is included in the game
AI tools assist in development and release tooling but do not generate any in-game content.
- Process
- AI-assisted
- Live AI during play
- No
Evidence & analysis details
- Evidence used
-
“I use AI in the engineering and release pipeline only, never to author the game itself”
“None of this creates any of the writing, art, audio, or design inside the game”
- Development workflow
- Code help Dev workflow
- Model-reported confidence
- 98% A model estimate, not a measured accuracy rate or a human review score.
Auto-classified from the public disclosure. The raw disclosure below remains the source of truth. How classification works.
AI Usage Disclosure
Dead Reckoning is written, and designed by one person. I want to be precise about where AI tools do and don't appear in it. Creative content — no generative AI. All writing, narrative, and design is mine. I've worked as a technical writer for twelve years; the game's voice is my own. All art and visual assets are hand-made or licensed from named human artists. All music and sound effects are licensed from named human creators (public domain / Creative Commons) — none of it is AI-generated. This is a hard line and I intend to keep it. Development & release tooling — where AI assists. I use AI in the engineering and release pipeline only, never to author the game itself: - Coding assistance while writing the game's GDScript. - An automated QA/test harness that plays the simulation thousands of times to catch crashes and balance regressions. - Assistance in building linters (Valve YAML sheets) that check the project's text. - Drafting and summarizing the release notes (patch notes) from the project's changelog. None of this creates any of the writing, art, audio, or design inside the game. Localization. The four translations (German, French, Italian, Spanish) are machine-translated by DeepL from my English source, with automated guards that fall back to English wherever a translation would break. This is an accessibility vs. quality decision, and I decided on the former. Proper localizations are planned and will be contracted out if the budget allows.
Highlights are auto-detected and may not be fully accurate. Report an issue
This disclosure in context
How comparisons workCompare this developer’s disclosure with 25,376 non-mature Steam products in the index. These figures describe published disclosures, not all games on Steam or independently verified AI use.
- AI-assisted content in the game
- 70.7%
- 17,631 of 24,946 disclosures with structured analysis.
- Compare this group
- Writing or localization
- 27.2%
- 6,893 of 25,376 indexed disclosures mention this category.
- Compare this category
Categories can overlap. A disclosure may mention several types of AI use.
Related disclosures
Selected by shared AI-use categories or classification, then Steam review count. These are comparisons of disclosures, not recommendations or assessments of game quality.
-
Banana
In-game content code text artAt Banana we use AI to help us develop our game in code, translations and background elements. No live AI systems are used in-game.
-
OPERATOR
In-game content art text audio codeOur team uses AI tools to assist development of some in-game content. The final product reflects the creativity and expression of our own development team.
-
World of Tanks: HEAT
In-game content code textGenerative AI is used solely during development for supplemental, non-essential purposes, including design ideation, code production support, or localization assistance. These AI-g…
-
Mandate Order
In-game content text art codeSome multilingual localized text content is AI-generated; parts of the code and art assets also contain AI-generated content.
Source and record
- First indexed
- May 23, 2026
- Source last checked
- Aug 25, 2026
- Automatic analysis updated
- Jul 6, 2026
- Recorded text changes
- 1 Read the history
The disclosure is the developer’s statement on Steam. Index dates show when we observed it, not when AI use began. History covers captured versions only. Automatic analysis can be wrong and is not a verification of the game’s content. Read the methodology.
Tags
Disclosure History
Captured versions of the developer’s statement. This record can miss changes between checks and does not establish when AI use began.
AI language tools were used during development as an editorial aid — helping revise and refine event text and narrative content. All final writing was created and edited by the writing team, and approved by the developer. No AI-generated artwork, writing, audio, or music is included in this game.
Dead Reckoning is written, and designed by one person. I want to be precise about where AI tools do and don't appear in it. Creative content — no generative AI. All writing, narrative, and design is mine. I've worked as a technical writer for twelve years; the game's voice is my own. All art and visual assets are hand-made or licensed from named human artists. All music and sound effects are licensed from named human creators (public domain / Creative Commons) — none of it is AI-generated. This is a hard line and I intend to keep it. Development & release tooling — where AI assists. I use AI in the engineering and release pipeline only, never to author the game itself: - Coding assistance while writing the game's GDScript. - An automated QA/test harness that plays the simulation thousands of times to catch crashes and balance regressions. - Assistance in building linters (Valve YAML sheets) that check the project's text. - Drafting and summarizing the release notes (patch notes) from the project's changelog. None of this creates any of the writing, art, audio, or design inside the game. Localization. The four translations (German, French, Italian, Spanish) are machine-translated by DeepL from my English source, with automated guards that fall back to English wherever a translation would break. This is an accessibility vs. quality decision, and I decided on the former. Proper localizations are planned and will be contracted out if the budget allows.