Disclosure analysis
AI content is included in the game
AI was used to generate localization files and placeholder store assets, but all in-game assets were created by humans.
- Process
- AI-generated and AI-assisted
- Live AI during play
- No
Evidence & analysis details
- Evidence used
-
“AI generative models were used to create localization files”
“AI generative models were used to create localization files to support languages that would otherwise be difficult for a solo developer”
- Model-reported confidence
- 95% A model estimate, not a measured accuracy rate or a human review score.
Auto-classified from the public disclosure. The raw disclosure below remains the source of truth. How classification works.
AI Usage Disclosure
AI generative models were used to create localization files to support languages that would otherwise be difficult for a solo developer. Placeholder AI-generated assets have been created for the Steam store splash images, with the intent of commissioning an artist if this gains community support. All in-game assets (sprites, music, sound effects, UI elements, and interactive content) were created by humans and are credited in the game credits. CPU opponents use traditional game AI algorithms, not generative AI models. This is the third iteration of development, that was originally developed in 2019 with HTML + JS, then rebuilt in Unity, and then transferred to LOVE2D written in Lua. It was more-or-less built with a box of scraps in a cave in its first iterations, and modern software since those days have effectively blurred the line where task automation meets unethical AI consumption. It's up to each of us to determine where that line is for ourselves in a rapidly changing digital age. As both a solo game dev and multimedia artist carrying a full-time job in neither of those fields, I feel that it's important to be educating ourselves on where AI can be a useful tool to allow new opportunities and expand capabilities for independent creators that are otherwise untenable, while keeping the human side of game dev at its core, especially in the indie genre.
Highlights are auto-detected and may not be fully accurate. Report an issue
This disclosure in context
How comparisons workCompare this developer’s disclosure with 25,497 non-mature Steam products in the index. These figures describe published disclosures, not all games on Steam or independently verified AI use.
- AI-assisted content in the game
- 70.7%
- 17,719 of 25,066 disclosures with structured analysis.
- Compare this group
- Writing or localization
- 27.3%
- 6,949 of 25,497 indexed disclosures mention this category.
- Compare this category
Categories can overlap. A disclosure may mention several types of AI use.
Related disclosures
Selected by shared AI-use categories or classification, then Steam review count. These are comparisons of disclosures, not recommendations or assessments of game quality.
-
Stellaris
In-game content art audio textWe employ generative AI technologies during the creation of some assets. Typically this involves the ideation of content and visual reference material. These elements represent a m…
-
eFootball™
In-game content art audio textDuring the development of this game, generative AI is used to create reference materials and support production tasks. Specifically, AI is utilised when carrying out the following …
-
Banana
In-game content code text artAt Banana we use AI to help us develop our game in code, translations and background elements. No live AI systems are used in-game.
-
Librarian: Tidy Up the Arcane Library!
In-game content art textThe four assets in this work—one UI component and three landscape paintings used as wall decorations (frames not included)—were produced using additional AI for refinement. None of…
Source and record
- First indexed
- Mar 18, 2026
- Source last checked
- Mar 26, 2026
- Automatic analysis updated
- Jul 7, 2026
- Recorded text changes
- 0
The disclosure is the developer’s statement on Steam. Index dates show when we observed it, not when AI use began. History covers captured versions only. Automatic analysis can be wrong and is not a verification of the game’s content. Read the methodology.