Disclosure analysis
The game uses live AI while you play
AI was used for refining visuals, localization, real-time community chat translation, and code assistance in development.
- Process
- AI-assisted, then edited
- Live AI during play
- Yes
Evidence & analysis details
- Evidence used
-
“used AI to refine my hand-drawn concepts into final assets”
“used AI to assist with naming and linguistic consistency”
- Development workflow
- Code help
- Model-reported confidence
- 95% A model estimate, not a measured accuracy rate or a human review score.
Auto-classified from the public disclosure. The raw disclosure below remains the source of truth. How classification works.
AI Usage Disclosure
I believe in being fully transparent with my players regarding the tools used to bring this project to life. As a solo developer and non-native English speaker, I have utilized AI as a supportive tool to enhance the experience, though the core vision and logic of the game remain my own. Art & Visuals: To ensure the game has a polished aesthetic, I used AI to refine my hand-drawn concepts into final assets. This allowed me to translate my original sketches into high-quality visuals that I otherwise could not have afforded as an independent creator. Language & Localization: With over 1,500 unique glyphs and numerous Rune combinations, I used AI to assist with naming and linguistic consistency. This ensures that the English translation is natural and clear for all players. Real-Time Community Chat: To foster an inclusive community, the game features an integrated translation tool. This allows players to chat in their native languages while providing instant translations for others, ensuring everyone can participate in the conversation. Development & Optimization: AI assisted in proofing my original combat code and expanding on my base mechanics to create more diverse gameplay options. It also serves as a diagnostic tool to help me identify and patch bugs quickly, ensuring a stable and fair experience for everyone. AI is a tool to empower my creativity, not a replacement for it. My goal is to use these technologies to deliver a deeper, more polished game than a solo project would typically allow.
Highlights are auto-detected and may not be fully accurate. Report an issue
This disclosure in context
How comparisons workCompare this developer’s disclosure with 25,376 non-mature Steam products in the index. These figures describe published disclosures, not all games on Steam or independently verified AI use.
- Writing or localization
- 27.2%
- 6,893 of 25,376 indexed disclosures mention this category.
- Compare this category
Categories can overlap. A disclosure may mention several types of AI use.
Related disclosures
Selected by shared AI-use categories or classification, then Steam review count. These are comparisons of disclosures, not recommendations or assessments of game quality.
-
Heartopia
Live AI art textAI-Generated Content Disclosure AI is used in the puzzle gameplay to reinterpret and redraw in-game snapshot images. AI is used in in-game chat to help players understand different…
-
Play Together
Live AI text art audioThis game uses generative AI to support both development and gameplay features. During development, AI tools were used to assist in creating certain text, visual, and audio assets.…
-
Galactic Civilizations IV
Live AI art textThis game used AI to help quickly iterate through designs for some UI elements using our own artwork as a baseline. AI is also used to help translate the game; and is used for the …
-
Source of Madness
Live AI art textIn Source of Madness, AI shapes the player experience by procedurally generating the Loam Lands, its monsters, and environments. Each encounter is unique, with neural-network-drive…
Source and record
- First indexed
- May 23, 2026
- Source last checked
- May 23, 2026
- Automatic analysis updated
- Jul 6, 2026
- Recorded text changes
- 0
The disclosure is the developer’s statement on Steam. Index dates show when we observed it, not when AI use began. History covers captured versions only. Automatic analysis can be wrong and is not a verification of the game’s content. Read the methodology.