Disclosure analysis
AI content is included in the game
AI was used to generate creature and location artwork, interface, code, and writing for the playable game, with no runtime AI disclosed.
- Process
- AI-generated and AI-assisted, then edited
- Live AI during play
- No
Evidence & analysis details
- Evidence used
-
“the creature and location artwork, the interface, a large share of the code and the writing”
“No image, no text and no game decision comes out of a model while you play”
- Development workflow
- Prototyping Code help
- Model-reported confidence
- 95% A model estimate, not a measured accuracy rate or a human review score.
Auto-classified from the public disclosure. The raw disclosure below remains the source of truth. How classification works.
AI Usage Disclosure
Crie au loup is made with AI, from the first prototype to the illustrations. That is not a manufacturing detail: it is as much the project as the game itself. My role is not a craftsman's: I painted no card, and I did not write the code line by line. I designed the system, I direct it, I arbitrate and I verify. Deciding what makes it into the game, what gets redone, what gets cut: that is production work, and it is mine. What is generated: the creature and location artwork, the interface, a large share of the code and the writing. What is measured rather than assumed: card balance, computed over thousands of simulated matches before every update. What is verified: the historical sources behind every legend, published one by one on the official site, where you can open them and prove me wrong. What is never generated is your match. No image, no text and no game decision comes out of a model while you play: the engine is deterministic, and the solo opponent is a classic program applying the rules. Crie au loup is one of the projects I run around generative AI, and the only one you can play. The making-of is documented without varnish in the devlog on the official site.
Highlights are auto-detected and may not be fully accurate. Report an issue
This disclosure in context
How comparisons workCompare this developer’s disclosure with 25,984 non-mature Steam products in the index. These figures describe published disclosures, not all games on Steam or independently verified AI use.
- AI-assisted content in the game
- 70.9%
- 18,104 of 25,552 disclosures with structured analysis.
- Compare this group
- Writing or localization
- 27.8%
- 7,222 of 25,984 indexed disclosures mention this category.
- Compare this category
Categories can overlap. A disclosure may mention several types of AI use.
Related disclosures
Selected by shared AI-use categories or classification, then Steam review count. These are comparisons of disclosures, not recommendations or assessments of game quality.
-
Banana
In-game content code text artAt Banana we use AI to help us develop our game in code, translations and background elements. No live AI systems are used in-game.
-
OPERATOR
In-game content art text audio codeOur team uses AI tools to assist development of some in-game content. The final product reflects the creativity and expression of our own development team.
-
Mandate Order
In-game content text art codeSome multilingual localized text content is AI-generated; parts of the code and art assets also contain AI-generated content.
-
Teamfight Manager 2
In-game content art text codeWe utilize AI technology to enhance development efficiency and provide a broader experience for our players. Our use of AI is categorized as follows: Art & Visuals: AI tools are u…
Source and record
- First indexed
- Sep 3, 2026
- Source last checked
- Sep 3, 2026
- Automatic analysis updated
- Sep 3, 2026
- Recorded text changes
- 0
The disclosure is the developer’s statement on Steam. Index dates show when we observed it, not when AI use began. History covers captured versions only. Automatic analysis can be wrong and is not a verification of the game’s content. Read the methodology.