Disclosure analysis
AI content is included in the game
AI generates raw graphics and assists with story editing, with manual refinement applied to both for the final game assets.
- Process
- AI-generated and AI-assisted, then edited
- Live AI during play
- No
Evidence & analysis details
- Evidence used
-
“Moon Shade Tarot: After the images are created by artificial intelligence, the core story concept and event for each card have been devised by our developer”
“All raw graphics are generated using AI”
- Model-reported confidence
- 95% A model estimate, not a measured accuracy rate or a human review score.
Auto-classified from the public disclosure. The raw disclosure below remains the source of truth. How classification works.
AI Usage Disclosure
The major portion of the stories in the game is fundamentally human-made. See below for details. All raw graphics are generated using AI. Subsequently, manual work is performed by our developer, including composition revisions, visual detail correction, and color synchronization of images. For Graphics For all stories, raw graphics are generated by AI. Depending on the image structure and complexity, one to three hours of manual graphics work is required to achieve the final result. For Stories Magical Cats: After the images are created by artificial intelligence, we use our natural intelligence to imagine and write appropriate stories for each image. Since these stories make little sense as they are intended to. Moon Shade Tarot: After the images are created by artificial intelligence, the core story concept and event for each card have been devised by our developer. AI is then used to expand and rewrite this content for narrative fluency and readability. Missing Velsoro (Rangers Under The Moons): The story, characters, and narrative are written by our writer. Some adjustments are done by our developer. The images are composed of multiple raw images to match the story. To improve fluency and enjoyment for native speakers, artificial intelligence is used to perform final grammatical and stylistic corrections on all of the stories. Please check the respective DLC explanations for similar usage details regarding their content.
Highlights are auto-detected and may not be fully accurate. Report an issue
This disclosure in context
How comparisons workCompare this developer’s disclosure with 25,394 non-mature Steam products in the index. These figures describe published disclosures, not all games on Steam or independently verified AI use.
- AI-assisted content in the game
- 70.7%
- 17,643 of 24,964 disclosures with structured analysis.
- Compare this group
- Writing or localization
- 27.2%
- 6,900 of 25,394 indexed disclosures mention this category.
- Compare this category
Categories can overlap. A disclosure may mention several types of AI use.
Related disclosures
Selected by shared AI-use categories or classification, then Steam review count. These are comparisons of disclosures, not recommendations or assessments of game quality.
-
Stellaris
In-game content art audio textWe employ generative AI technologies during the creation of some assets. Typically this involves the ideation of content and visual reference material. These elements represent a m…
-
eFootball™
In-game content art audio textDuring the development of this game, generative AI is used to create reference materials and support production tasks. Specifically, AI is utilised when carrying out the following …
-
Banana
In-game content code text artAt Banana we use AI to help us develop our game in code, translations and background elements. No live AI systems are used in-game.
-
Librarian: Tidy Up the Arcane Library!
In-game content art textThe four assets in this work—one UI component and three landscape paintings used as wall decorations (frames not included)—were produced using additional AI for refinement. None of…
Source and record
- First indexed
- Mar 18, 2026
- Source last checked
- Mar 26, 2026
- Automatic analysis updated
- Jul 7, 2026
- Recorded text changes
- 0
The disclosure is the developer’s statement on Steam. Index dates show when we observed it, not when AI use began. History covers captured versions only. Automatic analysis can be wrong and is not a verification of the game’s content. Read the methodology.